Gero Kuhlmann wrote: >>I note that many other mailinglist archives are replacing the @ sign >>with '_at_'. See >>http://www.caucho.com/support/resin-interest/0203/0356.html for an >>alternative presentation. >> >> > >Well, it could easily be done to search the archive with _at_ instead >of @ in order to gather email addresses. Therefore, I don't see a real >advantage. I think, the only thing to do about spam is to publish the >email address in the form of a small graphic because it would be too >difficult to parse those. But this would be very difficult to implement >into a text based mailing list archive. > At this point the spammers are not parsing email addresses with anti-spam transforms. See the previous link regarding what sort of activity generates the most spam. Posts to well traveled newsgroups and addresses posted plaintext on the web generated the most (spam). Removing or obfuscating the addresses significantly reduced the amount of spam within a week or two. It is true that any obfuscations made by algorithmic methods are generally reversible so in the long run this may not be an effective deterrant. One would need to generate a hash of the email address which would be useless as de-obfuscation would require a brute force search. On the other hand, if everyone is doing something slightly different, it makes the spammers job much harder to do, thus reducing spam. Crispin =========================================================================== This Mail was sent to netboot mailing list by: Crispin Murphy <email@example.com> To get help about this list, send a mail with 'help' as the only string in it's body to firstname.lastname@example.org. If you have problems with this list, send a mail to email@example.com.
For requests or suggestions regarding this mailing list archive please write to firstname.lastname@example.org.