> There is a work arround, by comment a few lines at "setup.s" file. It > works, more or less. You can find it at mailing list. Netboot doesn't have a "setup.s" file. There's a "setup.c" is that what you mean? I looked at the diff between 0.8.1 and 0.9.3 for setup.c but don't see anything which looks obvious to me as causing the problem. > Anyway, I got back to 0.8.1. version, and it works. Oh. I seem to remember some fix which was only in 0.9.3 about netboot sometimes not working (race condition). I'd rather run 0.9.3. > Regards, and sorry for my english. Your english is fine, I just can't find a "setup.s" in the netboot source. Perhaps I'll try comparing the bootrom source between 0.8.1 and 0.9.3. PS: I did find a thread on the mailing list about booting Intel cards from rom. I'm booting off of floppy, not rom so that doesn't apply. > Michael Stein wrote: > > >I'm trying to upgrade netboot versions but I'm finding that 0.9.3 doesn't > >get to the point of sending any packets on Intel Ethernet pro 100 cards. > >I've tried more than two different machines (even different motherboards) > >and they all stop after the message: > > > >Found packet driver at int 62, irq 0a > > > >Nothing happens after this. > > > >The previous version of netboot 0.8.1 will say it's sending out > >packets after this. What's interesting is that the e100bpkt.com > >in both version has exactly the same md5 checksum. > > > >Is this a known problem? > > > >Any ideas? > > > >I'd like to switch to 0.9.3 and use the PXE support... =========================================================================== This Mail was sent to netboot mailing list by: Michael Stein <firstname.lastname@example.org> To get help about this list, send a mail with 'help' as the only string in it's body to email@example.com. If you have problems with this list, send a mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
For requests or suggestions regarding this mailing list archive please write to email@example.com.