Re: appropriate code for a GRUB-specific option

[Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>]

On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 04:38:28PM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
[...]
>   So my question here is which code we should choose. I want to avoid
> conflicting with Etherboot or other implementations, if possible. If
> you have already determined that you will not use some regions in the
> future, let me know, please.

You could use the Vendor Class Identifier (code 60) and Vendor Specific
Information (code 43) options with encapsulated vendor-specific options
to create a private namespace for grub-specific options.  See sections
8.4 and 9.13 of RFC 2132.

-- 
 Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de>
 "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"
===========================================================================
This Mail was sent to netboot mailing list by:
Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>
To get help about this list, send a mail with 'help' as the only string in
it's body to majordomo@baghira.han.de. If you have problems with this list,
send a mail to netboot-owner@baghira.han.de.